I have been a resident in a home for eight years alongside an 83-year-old woman who has been a subject of ongoing victimisation and harassment for as long as she has lived in this home. Upon taking up residence, my wife and I were advised to avoid this woman, and indeed, we have done so until recently.
Nevertheless, we have maintained a distant relationship with her and were thus able to keep abreast of her day-to-day induced duress. Apart from having a god-child resident in a nearby town, she has no family.
Following a number of clandestine letters to the administrator and what can be interpreted as a kangaroo court, she has had her licence to reside at this home terminated. The governor and his cohorts refuse to divulge the content of the letters, thus making them dubious or even contrived.
The real origin of the issue remains a mystery. Harassment and intimidation are not something new to this place; I have tried to live beyond the chaos not compatible with my innate characteristics.
As a happily married person, I must clarify that the woman in question is merely a friend. Despite her age, she is intelligent and strong and does not tolerate foolishness. From what I have observed, there is a cultural and intellectual complexity that obscures the true cause of the issue.
Despite my circulating letter to all residents of the home, pleading for understanding and compassion, I unexpectedly became involved in a dispute that seemed to be fueled by bigotry, hatred, and resentment. Even new residents shared a hateful attitude, suggesting an institutional indoctrination.
The administration has been pressuring this person to leave for six months, but I have come to know her and find no fault in her character. She has a university degree and has held significant positions over her lifetime. The individuals attempting to rebuke her are intellectually inferior. The circumstances beg the question of whether impoverished seniors require such close supervision that results in being forced into a harsh exterior environment.
The intended eviction has been a harsh and cruel expectation due to the serious lack of equivalent accommodation in the area. Further, the content of the clandestine letters has never been revealed.
Extensive modifications had to be made to accommodate a frail 82-year-old in the alternative lodging that was found. It raises the question of whether my donations to this charity should be utilised to rectify an obvious error in judgment.